1. I believe they should have been persuading us. They should have wanted us to be on their side of the argument.
2. They weren’t really persuading the audience they were using dialogue to talk back and forth to one another. They were talking amongst themselves how to “kill” this old man.
3. Well-informed ; they didn’t have enough information.
Self Critical; they weren’t seeing the other side of the argument they thought their ideas were right and that was it.
Argue with their audiences or readers in mind; they weren’t arguing with readers in mind they were arguing for their own “hypothetical” theory
Arguments context; they weren’t arguing in the future they were arguing in the present and were only arguing to benefit the person in the example.
4. Steve persuaded Steven into agreeing with his side by saying if you agree I will give you what you want. Which was a way to kill off an old rich man. Steven didn’t stick to his argument enough.
It can help me with making better points and that it can show me new and improved way to make my point. It can help me break down the writing and understand it better.
ENGLISH HWK 